Жалобы на игроков

[OFFTOПыч]

уважаемая администрация просьба отправить в бан данного персонажа за разжигание менцаиональной розни за фашисткий ник STEAM_1:0:494779245
надеюсь не только для меня данный персонаж со своим ник неймом неприемлем

---

Администрация: Рассмотрено.

 

[Nazza]

Hello everyone. I want to respond clearly and respectfully to the defense of the player who reported the alleged use of a wallhack and aimbot in Left 4 Dead 2. My intention is not to generate personal conflict, but rather to record the facts shown in the video and why I believe their explanation is insufficient to rule out the use of cheating.

Regarding the shot at the Jockey (clip 1):
The player claims he fired as a precaution at an incapacitated survivor, but the video shows that the shot was direct and accurate at the Jockey, with no cover bursts or scanning. This is not a "fluke," but pinpoint accuracy aimed at an invisible target, which raises reasonable suspicions of a wallhack.

Regarding the alleged aimbot (clips 2 and 3):
He claims he was jumping, but the camera clearly shows him on the ground, shooting straight at a wall. Furthermore, the laser doesn't show the vertical movement it should have if he were shooting in the air. The way it reacts and fires seems automated and unnatural, typical of a basic aimbot.

Regarding the minimum graphics settings:
It's true that playing with low graphics can alter the appearance of shadows or lights, but it doesn't remove solid walls or provide visibility over completely hidden enemies. Using the minimum settings doesn't justify knowing the exact position of special infections behind obstacles, as occurs repeatedly in the video.

Conclusion
I stand by my report because the behaviors shown in the video don't correspond to normal gameplay and can't be explained solely by reflexes, intuition, or chance. If the player wishes to prove they aren't cheating, they can record their gameplay showing the full screen, game settings, and real-time performance.

I'm fully open to withdrawing my report if evidence is presented to clarify this, but until then, please consider the evidence strong enough to warrant further investigation.

Thank you for reading.

Well to start this whole show :v here I have a video that shows how it looks through a wall

Sorry for the quality.....The video shows what the Jockey and Boomer look like when I move away from the wall. Other players might think I'm using a wallhack.


If you saw me playing suspiciously at that moment, my question is, WHY DIDN'T YOU ASK FOR A DEMO AT THAT TIME? I would have gladly let you see how I played, because those demos of yours are kind of weird.

That said, using all graphics on low doesn't mean you can see through all walls; there are some walls you can't see through.

Here are my in-game video settings.

 

[Habibi]

Well to start this whole show :v here I have a video that shows how it looks through a wall

Sorry for the quality.....The video shows what the Jockey and Boomer look like when I move away from the wall. Other players might think I'm using a wallhack.


If you saw me playing suspiciously at that moment, my question is, WHY DIDN'T YOU ASK FOR A DEMO AT THAT TIME? I would have gladly let you see how I played, because those demos of yours are kind of weird.

That said, using all graphics on low doesn't mean you can see through all walls; there are some walls you can't see through.

Here are my in-game video settings.

Response to the Reported Player's Supposed "Defense"

Thanks for responding, but I regret to say that your explanation doesn't dispel reasonable doubts about the use of cheats. Below, I'll comment on your arguments point by point:

1. "Sorry for the quality... the video shows what the infected look like from a distance."

That's precisely part of the problem. A low-quality video, recorded with another device's camera and without a HUD (player interface), can't be considered valid evidence. Anyone can move the camera and similar movements. What's needed is an internal recording (using OBS or similar), showing your full HUD, pointer, pings, and settings in real time, not a "phone" recording.

Also, the fact that "other players might think they're using a wallhack" is already worrying. No one should have to constantly justify fair gameplay if it really is.

2. "Why didn't they ask for a demo at the time?"

Because it's not the player's obligation to ask for a demo right away. The HLStats system and the videos collected post-match are valid tools for retrospective analysis. The fact that a real-time demonstration wasn't requested doesn't invalidate the subsequent evidence.

Furthermore, the defiant and evasive attitude instead of openly cooperating raises further suspicions. If you're so sure of your innocence, why don't you record a full game now and upload it, as requested?

3. "Playing on low graphics doesn't mean you can see through walls."

Exactly. Thanks for confirming that. And that's precisely why your actions are unjustifiable. It's not about seeing blurred "shadows" or "silhouettes": the shots in clips 1 and 2 go directly to the Jockey and the infected hidden behind solid structures, without any prior scanning animation, no visible external information, and no obvious sounds to justify it.

Conclusion

Your "defense" doesn't explain either the automated aimbot-like behavior or the precise shots in areas where there was no visibility. A cell phone video and a screenshot of your settings aren't enough to refute evidence obtained with DEMs and clean recordings.

Let me make it clear again: if you're not cheating, record an entire game with your full HUD, pointer visible, and video and sound settings on screen, and upload it. It's the least you could do if you really want to clear your name.

Until then, the report stands.

Best regards.